Plans¶
Plans record work proposals and decisions before SASE starts the work they describe.
SDD is sase's system for persisting the intent behind agent work. When an agent submits a plan for approval, SDD keeps the approved planning artifact in the plans store and links it to the canonical prompt archive in the agents sidecar, creating a traceable chain from intent to execution. In this guide, "plan-like artifact" means a tale or epic.
SDD is sase's system for persisting the intent behind agent work. When an agent submits a plan for approval, SDD keeps the approved planning artifact in the plans store and links it to the canonical prompt archive in the agents sidecar, creating a traceable chain from intent to execution. In this guide, "plan-like artifact" means a tale or epic.
Why SDD Exists¶
Agent plans are ephemeral by default -- they live in a single session's context window and vanish when the session ends. SDD fixes this by writing plans and linked prompt archives to disk as first-class artifacts:
- Prompts preserve a durable primary body and, when available, the final
preprocessed prompt SASE handed to the provider in the agents sidecar's
prompts/<YYYYMM>/archive. For an approved plan, the primary body is the dry-expanded planning snapshot; for an ordinary commit publication, it is the pre-expansion Macro. - Tales record ordinary approved implementation plans, so decomposition decisions are queryable after the fact.
- Epics record executable multi-phase plans that can be handed to
sase bead work. - Research records exploratory findings, prior art, options, critiques, and recommendations that inform later work.
- Beads provide structured issue tracking that links SDD artifacts to execution via
plan-like bead tiers and phase or epic IDs in
SASE_BEAD=commit footers.
Together, these create an audit trail from prompt archives to planning artifacts and supporting context. Tales and epics can link into the bead hierarchy and phase commits; research notes preserve the longer-lived context those plans depend on.
Provider-Owned Storage¶
The workspace provider selects an initial policy; a materialized store record supplies the concrete layout:
in_treestores artifacts under the checkout'ssdd/directory and commits them with code changes.localis the fallback for providerless projects and stores artifacts at the primary workspace's.sase/sdd/.separate_repostores artifacts in a workspace-local.sase/sdd/clone backed by a provider-materialized sidecar repo.sidecar_reposstores plans in an auto-cloned--plansrepo and every configured document role in its own sidecar. A schema-3 record stores bead state at the root of its dedicated--beadsclone; a schema-2 compatibility record keepsbeads/under--plans. Initialization prepares configured sidecars in its current workspace; later workspaces clone the beads sidecar and lazy document roles on demand instead of during workspace preparation. Monthly directories live directly at document roots; single-root layouts remain readable for compatibility.
Use sase repo path plans or sase repo path beads to print those resolved roots, or
sase repo path research --ensure to materialize and print the research root. Launched
agents receive SASE_SDD_DIR and per-kind SASE_SDD_*_DIR variables, so prompts and
hooks should use those variables or repo resolvers instead of assuming sdd/ is
relative to the checkout.
Project and user configuration cannot override this selection. See SDD Storage for the provider contract, sidecar-repo convention, setup guidance, and offline/push behavior.
For built-in bare-git projects, SASE creates or refreshes the generated SDD guide files
automatically. Target an existing project with its +<project>
project tag; first-use #git:<project>
initialization (which creates a new project and keeps its #git: spelling) includes
them in the initial commit; existing bare-repo registration, #git materialization, and
sase repo open commit and push an Initialize SDD init commit when the generated
files are missing or stale. First SDD writes, plan archiving, and sase bead init also
refresh the generated files before writing project-local SDD content.
Research notes live under research/{YYYYMM}/ inside the effective SDD root. A
#research macro (defined in user or project config -- the packaged default was
removed) conventionally tells the agent to create a new markdown file in the current
month directory; SASE does not write research files automatically.
How SDD Works¶
Prompt Archive Publication¶
SASE has two prompt-publication paths, and their ordering matters:
- Approved plan: while handling approval, SASE first dry-expands the planner
prompt, publishes the plan-named archive entry, and then writes the tale or hands the
epic to
sase bead work. Dry expansion resolves macros, strips prompt directives, and inlines workflowprompt_partcontent without executing pre- or post-steps. - Agent-backed commit: after the primary commit succeeds, the commit workflow
publishes the run's
raw_macros.mdinline. Project and configured macro aliases have already been resolved, but macros have not been expanded. A plan-backed entry uses the plan slug; an entry without a plan uses the publishing agent's global lane name.
That plan snapshot or pre-expansion Macro becomes the archive body. SASE turns staged
@... references into durable links when possible.
Artifact Persistence¶
The approved plan artifact is:
- Annotated with a
create_timefrontmatter field - Given a required
tier: tale|epicfrontmatter value and written to<plans-root>/{YYYYMM}/{plan_name}.md, where{YYYYMM}is derived from the current date. ItsPROMPTheader links to the canonical prompt archive entry in the agents sidecar,prompts/{YYYYMM}/{plan_name}.md, when that prompt has been published.
For tales, the agent runner publishes the prompt before it writes and commits the
promoted plan; these are ordered operations, not one atomic cross-repository
transaction. For epics, the runner likewise publishes the planner prompt first, while
the canonical sase bead work <plan-file> command owns archiving and linking the plan
itself. This keeps host approval and the finishing planner agent from writing the same
plan concurrently.
Plans and research notes are organized into YYYYMM subdirectories (for example,
202603/) based on the creation date. Canonical prompts are organized in the agents
sidecar under prompts/<YYYYMM>/; copied prompt-linked bytes live in that sidecar's
content-addressed files/objects/sha256/<hex-prefix>/<sha256> object store. Plan
discovery remains limited to <plans-root>/<YYYYMM>/*.md. Resolve the plans root with
sase repo path plans or SASE_SDD_PLANS_DIR; historical plans-sidecar prompt
directories, top-level prompts/, and specs/ aliases remain readable for
compatibility.
Planning artifacts may also carry a status field (set to done when work completes)
and a bead_id field linking to the bead issue tracker. For an epic,
sase bead work <plan-file> writes bead_id after it creates the epic and phase beads.
Re-running the command sees that link and resumes the existing epic instead of creating
duplicates.
When an epic is proposed from a bead-work phase agent, SASE records that phase's ID as
the managed parent_bead; an epic proposed by the land agent records the current epic's
ID instead. An agent working a task bead records that task's ID, so a proposed epic
becomes a child of the task. Approving the proposal creates a child epic under that
bead, so a proposal from <phase-bead-id> becomes <phase-bead-id>.1, while a child
proposed by a land agent becomes the next numbered child after the authored phases, and
a task-worker proposal becomes <task-bead-id>.1. Agents with no bead association at
all continue to create top-level epics.
When sase plan propose submits a plan for approval, it touches the project's
~/.sase/projects/<project>/artifacts/.ace_refresh_pulse so any running sase's TUI
flips the agent into the tier-aware TALE or EPIC pending-review status immediately
rather than waiting for the next auto-refresh tick. Plans with a missing or unreadable
tier use the PLAN fallback. The pulse file is consumed by the inotify-based artifact
watcher and is harmless when no TUI is open.
sase plan propose formats the plan with prettier and re-validates the formatted copy
before archiving it. It then formats that copy a second time, matching archival, and
re-validates again. If either pass would change the plan's validity or its decision
callouts, propose exits non-zero and proposes nothing: the scratch file, the archive,
and the running agent are left untouched, so the agent can fix the plan and propose
again. SASE protects intraword underscores (snake_case) from Prettier's emphasis
parsing so a second pass cannot rewrite identifiers into snake*case.
Humans can approve the pending proposal from sase's TUI or from the CLI. sase plan
lists pending PlanApproval notifications, recent approvals, and inferred rejected
archived proposals. sase plan approve <name> defaults to a tale; an epic-authored plan
requires an explicit --kind epic or --kind tale to prevent an accidental downgrade.
The command can also directly approve an archived or scratch plan with no live gate;
--dry-run previews it and --project supplies explicit project context. When
--project is omitted, a proposal's frontmatter project field supplies the project.
Approving an already-approved plan relaunches a failed, killed, or never-launched coder
and refuses one that is running or finished. The selected target schema is validated
before the response, SDD copy, or notification dismissal, and failures leave the
proposal pending.
For a saved epic file with no live approval gate, use sase bead work <plan-file>. The
direct sase plan approve route does not launch gateless epics. An explicit
--kind tale instead runs that plan as a single tale after tale-schema validation.
Tale approval promotes the plan and launches its coder through the agent runner. Every
epic approval surface — sase's TUI, the CLI, Telegram, or a bare gate response — instead
hands sase bead work <plan-file> --yes-to-all to a durable supervisor, because
launching an epic's phases is itself a long-running command that must outlive the
approving process.
The preferred form is a monitor turn under the planner's
own agent session, labeled Epic launch · <plan>. The monitor turn reads
EPIC APPROVED while sase bead work runs and uses its configured EPIC CREATED label
after any terminal outcome—even failure, timeout, stop, or loss. Treat the monitor's
state, bucket, exit code, and output as the result. Only a successful launch attempts to
back-fill the epic ID; when that metadata lands, the planner row itself moves to
EPIC CREATED, and otherwise it remains EPIC APPROVED. No follow-up agent is recorded
— sase bead work launches the phase agents itself — and the monitor takes a zero
workspace claim, since the launch runs in the project's primary workspace rather than
the planner's. If the planner's agent session cannot be resolved (a very old artifacts
layout, or a wiped agent), the launch falls back to an unattributed command proc with
the same command and label rather than silently dropping the approval. Other
monitor-start errors fail the approval rather than selecting that fallback.
Either way the launch is durable: it survives the approving process, and normal command
success or failure emits the epic-completion notification. Inspect a monitor-backed
launch with sase monitor list / sase monitor show <id> --follow; the unattributed
proc fallback appears in every default sase proc list and Procs-tab scope and streams
with sase proc show <id> --follow. A durable manual fallback is
sase proc run --session none --label 'Epic launch · <plan>' -- sase bead work <plan> --yes-to-all.
If the approval host cannot resolve or submit the launch, approval fails loudly with a
direct sase bead work <plan> --yes-to-all resume command (plus applicable metadata
flags), not the wrapper above, instead of falling back to an invisible planner-side
subprocess. On the proc fallback path, which has no monitor row to relabel, the planner
remains EPIC APPROVED until successful metadata back-fill makes the created epic
known.
--kind approve runs the coder without committing an SDD plan, while --kind commit
records the approved plan in SDD without launching a coder. --wait accepts
comma-separated agent names and bead=<id> entries; tale approvals apply that wait to
the coder, and epic approvals apply it to the launched phase agents.
sase plan reject <name> writes the same no-feedback rejection response as the TUI,
then attempts to dismiss and user-kill the matching planner row when it can be found.
To recall prior planning artifacts, sase plan search [QUERY] searches plans, research,
and historical prompt snapshots in the resolved SDD store (the repo source, surfaced
first) plus the machine-local ~/.sase/plans/ archive. Use sase agent prompts list
and sase agent prompts show for the canonical agents-sidecar prompt archive. The query
is optional — omit it to browse and filter with repeatable
--kind tale|epic|prompt|<document-role> (any configured document sidecar, such as
research), --status, --source, and --since/--until date bounds. Results are
ranked (relevance with a query, recency without; --sort overrides), capped by
--limit (default 20, 0 for unlimited), and render as colored compact/full output
or as agent-friendly json/markdown via --format.
Once you know which plan you want, sase plan show [TARGET] resolves it — a path, a
plan: reference, a pending-approval selector, a bare slug or <shard>/<slug>, or a
bead id — to exactly one plan and renders it as a colored, section-structured detail
view matching the PLAN lane in sase's TUI, with compact, json, and byte-faithful
raw output alongside the default full view. See
CLI for the resolution ladder and format
details.
Q&A Sections¶
If the agent asks clarifying questions during planning (via the /sase_questions
skill), the Q&A exchange is appended to the prompt archive document so the full context
of planning decisions is preserved.
Multi-round Q&A is rendered as a single merged ### Questions and Answers section with
monotonic Q1..QN numbering across all rounds (a second round of questions continues at
the next free number rather than restarting at Q1). The section is wrapped in exactly
one %macros_enabled pair regardless of round count, and follow-up writes strip any
existing Q&A blocks (including duplicates) before re-emitting the merged section. When a
round carries a global note the "last non-empty wins" rule applies — a later round's
note replaces the earlier one, but an empty later note preserves the earlier value.
Artifact Links¶
Archived prompts and plan-like artifacts link to each other through ordinary Markdown
bullets, so GitHub renders the counterpart as a clickable link. A plan opens with a
header block: a contiguous run of those bullets, in the fixed order PROMPT,
PARENT, BEAD, AGENTS, ARTIFACTS, COMMITS, that carries the plan's full
provenance.
---
tier: tale
title: Example
goal: Demonstrate the plan-side layout.
size: small
---
- **PROMPT:** `<prompt-path>`
- **PARENT:** `<parent-plan-path>`
- **BEAD:** `<bead-page-url>`
- **AGENTS:** `<agent-log-url>`
- **COMMITS:** `<commit-url>`
# Plan: Example
The prompt names its plan:
---
create_time: 2026-07-21 12:00:00
---
- **PLAN:** `<plan-path>`
- **AGENTS:** `<agent-log-url>`
- **ARTIFACTS:** `<artifact-path>`
Original prompt text may refer to a local artifact with `@~/Downloads/diagram.png`.
When YAML frontmatter exists, its opening --- remains at byte zero. The header block
is the first Markdown body element after the closing delimiter, followed by exactly one
blank line before the authored content (including an H1). Without frontmatter, the block
starts at the first file line. PROMPT and PLAN name the linked counterpart.
The text inside [] is the storage-layout-aware stable label. For current PROMPT and
PLAN links, the href inside () is normally a hosted cross-repository URL: plans
point at the agents sidecar's prompts/<YYYYMM>/, and prompts point back at the plans
sidecar's <YYYYMM>/*.md file. Historical file-relative prompt-to-plan and
plan-to-prompt hrefs remain valid and readable during migration.
Header Block Sections¶
| Section | Shape | Destination |
|---|---|---|
PLAN |
one link (prompts) | hosted plan URL in the plans sidecar, else a historical relative href |
PROMPT |
one link (plans) | hosted prompt URL in the agents sidecar, else a historical relative href |
PARENT |
one link | hosted plan URL in the plans sidecar, else a file-relative href |
BEAD |
one link or label | hosted bead page when available and not disproved by a readable store |
AGENTS |
ordered sub-bullets | hosted agent README URL in the agents sidecar, else an unlinked name |
ARTIFACTS |
ordered sub-bullets | hosted repository blobs or agents-sidecar file-object links |
COMMITS |
ordered sub-bullets | hosted commit URL in the primary repository, else an unlinked SHA |
Sub-bullets are indented exactly two spaces and deterministically ordered: agents by
name, artifacts by rendered prompt order, and commits by full SHA (or by the short-SHA
label of an unlinked commit), so every writer produces the same order. Commit
sub-bullets show the seven-character short SHA as link text and append — <subject>. A
section with nothing to show is omitted entirely — an empty - **AGENTS:** header is
never rendered — and a list longer than the shared render cap ends with a visible
… and N more sub-bullet instead of being silently truncated. Rendered bullets are
wrap-tolerant: prettier may fold a long commit sub-bullet onto continuation lines, and
parsing joins those lines back into one logical bullet.
SASE owns the header block; do not author it by hand. A bullet that deviates from the
canonical form above is a validation error (header-invalid), not a style choice: a
link-shaped section (PLAN, PROMPT, PARENT, BEAD) must be a bolded key followed
by exactly one Markdown link and nothing else — BEAD alone may instead carry a bare
unlinked label, as the table above notes — and a list-shaped section (AGENTS,
ARTIFACTS, COMMITS) must be a bare bolded key with at least one indented sub-bullet
and no inline content. Repeating a section, or carrying both PLAN and PROMPT in one
document, is the same error.
The diagnostic names the offending path and the parser's reason, and the same
header-invalid code is raised at every validation surface: sase plan validate,
sase plan links validate, sase plan links refresh, the plan approval gate, and
sase bead work. sase bead work validates the source file before it archives
anything, so a malformed block fails with that diagnostic and leaves no partially
written destination file behind.
BEAD is a projection of durable state. It comes from the plan's managed bead_id (or
historical bead) frontmatter and is rebuilt on every refresh. It links when a hosted
page URL can be formed and a readable bead store does not show the ID to be missing.
sase plan propose stamps that managed bead field when a tale is proposed by a phase
agent, land agent, or task-bead worker with an active bead association. If the resolved
store is readable and confirms that the bead is absent, or if no hosted page URL is
available, it remains an unlinked label so historical IDs do not become dead links. If
the store cannot be read, refresh preserves a candidate hosted link rather than
stripping potentially valid links during a transient failure.
AGENTS and COMMITS are derived from SASE_PLAN= / SASE_AGENT= commit footers and
agent artifact metadata, then merged into the rows the plan already carries. A refresh
only sees the commits and agent artifacts available where it runs, so it adds the rows
it derives and updates the text and link of rows it derives again, but it never removes
a row. A refresh that derives nothing leaves both sections untouched, and two machines
that refresh in either order converge on the same rows. Agent rows are matched by name;
commit rows are matched by the full SHA in their link, or by short-SHA label when
unlinked, and a linked row replaces an unlinked row with the same label. Because rows
are never pruned, correcting a wrong footer or artifact does not remove a row that an
earlier refresh already wrote.
Both sources are normalized to the sase agent, so each sase agent is listed exactly
once: a plan touched by pc--code and pc--plan shows a single pc row linked to the
session page, never the member and its session as two agents. Solo agents are listed
exactly as before. The row's link is taken from the concrete turn when any source knew
one, otherwise from the destination recorded in the commit footer, and it degrades to an
unlinked label rather than guessing a URL. Bead-page agent rows follow the same rule,
and their commit counts are the sase agent's commits. An epic plan's sections roll up
its own associations with those of every descendant plan reachable through PARENT.
sase plan links refresh reconciles the whole tree (dry run by default; --write to
apply, --plan <ref> to scope to one plan), and each primary commit refreshes the plan
it names on a best-effort basis — a plans-store failure never blocks the code commit.
Refreshes on different machines can still edit the same plan concurrently. When SASE
rebases a plans store (sidecar integration, or a bare-git project's commit rebase) and a
month-sharded plan file conflicts only in its AGENTS and COMMITS rows, SASE resolves
the conflict itself: it writes the union of both sides' rows, keeps the local side's
text for a row both sides carry, and stages the file. A difference in frontmatter,
PROMPT, PARENT, BEAD, or the authored body, an unparseable header, or a
modify/delete conflict is never merged; it is left to SASE's normal conflict handling,
which for sidecar integration restores the pre-rebase state (see
SDD Storage).
A plan's parent is recorded in the PARENT bullet. The parent: frontmatter property
remains accepted for existing committed plans, with a deprecation warning;
sase plan links refresh --write moves it into a PARENT bullet. Plans whose parent:
value does not resolve to a real plan file are reported rather than dropped.
plan: and prompt: values in plain-path or inline-Markdown form remain readable.
Ordinary reads, search, validation, and initialization do not rewrite them. A canonical
bullet and matching property may coexist; conflicting, malformed, duplicate, wrong-kind,
unsafe, or unresolved links are reported rather than guessed. Run
sase plan links repair --write to install canonical bullets and remove matching
properties. See the
plan-frontmatter migration note.
sase plan links validate checks a tale or epic's own PROMPT bullet is well-formed;
it does not check that a matching prompt file exists, since prompts live in the
agents-sidecar archive rather than the plans tree. Research notes are durable SDD
context, but they are not part of the prompt-plan link validator.
Model Field¶
Plan files may carry an optional top-level model: field in YAML frontmatter to record
the model the work should run under. The value uses the same syntax %model accepts: a
bare known model name (e.g. opus), a provider-qualified id (e.g. codex/gpt-6.1-sol),
or a configured local alias (e.g. #pro).
# plans/202605/example.md
tier: tale
model: opus
For an epic, the top-level model selects the final land-agent model. Per-phase models
live only in the structured phases[].model frontmatter entries; body annotations are
not interpreted:
tier: epic
title: Model-routed rollout
goal: Complete the rollout and verify it end to end
model: claude/opus
phases:
- id: implementation
title: Implement the rollout
depends_on: []
size: medium
- id: exercise
title: Exercise the completed rollout
depends_on: [implementation]
size: xsmall
On Epic approval, SASE deterministically copies the top-level model to the epic plan
bead and each phase's model and size to its phase bead. xsmall, small, and medium
phases implement directly with @xsmall, @small, and @medium, respectively. Only
large and xlarge phases receive #plan, after their work reference, and use
@large and @xlarge. Each size alias is a direct selector with its own shipped
target; there is no second-alias hop. Set an explicit phase model only when the user's
prompt requested that model; the explicit model is valid at every size and always wins
over size-derived routing without changing whether the phase receives #plan. When the
top-level model is omitted, the land agent uses llm_provider.epic_lander_model
(shipped default @large) below bead.big_epic_phase_threshold and
llm_provider.big_epic_lander_model (shipped default @xlarge) at or above the
threshold (default 5). These are independent scalar fields, each with its own shipped
default; neither falls back through the other or through a default alias. An explicit
top-level land model or direct field override still wins. The approval preview and
emitted launch prompt use these same rules. Routing counts every authored phase,
including already-closed phases when an epic resumes, so the selected lander field stays
stable throughout the epic.
Choose xsmall only for the very simplest tasks that need almost no reasoning, such as
launching SASE agents purely to observe their output while testing a SASE agent feature.
Choose small for focused work that can be implemented directly. Choose medium for
substantial work that can still be implemented directly from its phase description.
Choose large for work that needs a separate planning handoff and may itself justify an
epic plan. Choose xlarge rarely: it admits the task is too large to plan effectively
alone, or deliberately defers planning part of a feature until other parts are
implemented.
Moved to Plan format. Moved to Plan format.
Committed Plan Validation Cutover¶
Plans committed under a YYYYMM directory at or after 202608 must pass the complete
tier-specific frontmatter schema. SASE applies this gate before its SDD writers archive
or commit a plan, and CI runs just validate-committed-plans against the checked-out
plans sidecar. The sweep reports diagnostics for every plan in one run and fails if any
error is present.
For month directories before 202608, the compatibility check requires: each direct
YYYYMM/*.md plan must declare a valid tier: tale|epic, but historical plans do not
need goal or structured epic phases. Exported or historical nested prompt snapshots
and historical root-level scratch files are not part of the committed-plan sweep.
Related¶
_[project]: A sase project is a named unit of work registered with SASE. _[workspace]: A sase workspace is a numbered clone of a project's primary repo, managed by the workspace store and tracked in that project's registry.json. _[agent]: A sase agent is an agent session or a single agent that does not belong to a session. _[prompt]: A prompt is the text SASE hands to a provider to start an agent turn. _[macro]: A macro is a reusable prompt triggered with #name in agent prompts. _[Patch]: A Patch is SASE's local unit of change. _[bead]: A bead is one tracked work item in SASE's git-native issue tracker. _[plan]: A plan is a persisted, approved artifact recording the intent behind agent work. _[TUI]: The TUI is SASE's terminal interface for running agents and reviewing results. _[epic]: An epic is an executable multi-phase plan run with sase bead work. _[gate]: A sase gate is a durable, command-backed request for one user decision, created when work must pause for the user. _[monitor]: A sase monitor is a monitor turn that runs one long command under a detached supervisor, so the command outlives the agent that started it. *[stitch]: A stitch is the lightweight ordered change record inside a Patch's STITCHES: section.